Unfair question time:
Which two films, however incongruous, would make up your two-favorite-film double-feature?
The answers so far:
Alice Chang: Bound and Persona (the latter after a brief flirtation with Eternal Sunshine...).
Camilla Mason (nee Rocchi) (pondering briefly): Easter Parade and Gone with the Wind.
Jeri-Claire Mason: Heathers and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
Paula Mason (nee Skoe): Dune (the cinematic film) and Stardust.
Robert Mason: 2001: A Space Odyssey and Picnic.
"Ellen Canby": everyday film-viewing: Die Hard and Die Hard with a Vengeance (and when she's in certain moods, Queen Margot and Enchanted April)
Rick Robinson: The Wild Bunch and Apolcalypse Now
Kate Laity: (winnowing down from her suggestions and our conversations over the years): Suspiria and Bedazzled (though I suspect His Girl Friday might easily bump the first)
Selma Blair, facing "The Big Empty"
Dave Eggers is a consistently bad writer, who nevertheless has not only achieved popularity with his bad writing but put at least some of the profits from that to often interesting, frequently beneficial ends. His projects to further literacy and provide interesting activities for bright kids in the SF Bay area and elsewhere are highly laudable; his magazine McSweeney's is not consistently good (a bad writer is not likely to be a reliable editor) though at times very good indeed (certainly the guest-edited Michael Chabon issues have been impressive); his Houghton Mifflin annual (apparently assembled with kids from his project), The Best American Nonrequired Reading, is consistently engaging enough, even if it can't quite make up for the quick disappearance of the Beacon Best annual (not that it was trying to, but it did appear shortly after that other fine project published its second and last volume). A launch off to the side of McSweeney's has been the video magazine Wholphin, the initial issue of which was offered wrapped up with the then-current issues of the literary magazine. That first issue was also an interestingly mixed bag, though the charmingly loopy "The Big Empty" with Selma Blair, an adaptation of Alison Smith's "The Specialist," a short story published in McSweeney's #11, and Miranda July's "Are You the Favorite Person of Anybody?" were for me the most memorable segments, with many of the others, particularly Patton Oswalt's brief bit of comic performance art with David Byrne, being at least pleasant and interesting enough. They have gone on to produce a number of issues since, as one of the more in-hand sources of short-film aggregation one can find of late...as opposed to, say, My Damn Channel or Funny or Die...or the various short-film showcases on PBS and independent public stations, and IFC and Sundance, too many of which seem to be slipping away...does anyone else remember the PBS weekly series, The International Festival of Animation, nimbly hosted by Jean Marsh?
I can't imagine why I don't remember that series at all.
ReplyDeleteBetween the Windsor CBC station and whoever in Detroit might also have run it (if anyone), I imagine it was pushed a bit, but I suspect you might've had other priorities in the '80s. Have a pair of favorite films for the poll?
ReplyDelete2 film favorites for a double feature. Hmm. I'll go with what hopped into the frontal lobes first:
ReplyDeleteAPOCALYPSE NOW and THE WILD BUNCH
Well, there's a cheery pair! Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI really dislike Eggers in so many ways, and am doubly irritated that he was asked to intro the new Vonnegut collection, but he does put some of his huge cash piles to good use.
ReplyDeleteMy perfect double feature would entirely depend upon mood. Could be Now, Voyager and Old Acquaintance, could be Holiday and Philadelphia Story, could be Opera and Suspiria, could be Bedazzled and Young Frankenstein or any of a billion more. Okay, I exaggerate slightly. Only slightly.
Even his introductions are frequently difficult to read, even if still better than nearly anything William Vollmann has drooled into print. Rather like John Irving only more publicly so, Eggers is bad (and frequently expressing at least some reprehensible attitude), but well-meaning.
ReplyDelete