Below, the contents of that issue of If; the best and most important story in the issue is the Damon Knight story, "Anachron." Larry Shaw, like Knight a former Futurian, was the editor of the magazine, but could be overruled by the publisher James Quinn, who retained the editorial title for himself (with Shaw officially as associate ed.).
The Internet Archive posting of the January 1954 issue of If is here.
- Publication: If, January 1954
(View All Issues) (View Issue Grid) - Editors: James L. Quinn; Larry T. Shaw
- Year: 1954-01-00
- Publisher: Quinn Publishing Company, Inc.; Buffalo, NY
- Price: $0.35
- Pages: 124
- Binding: digest
- fep • Monorail Trains • interior artwork by Ed Valigursky
- 2 • A Chat With the Editor (If, January 1954) • [A Chat With the Editor (If)] • essay by Larry T. Shaw
- 4 • Malice in Wonderland • novella by Evan Hunter
- 4 • Malice in Wonderland • interior artwork by Frank Kelly Freas [as by Kelly Freas ]
- 50 • Letter of the Law • shortstory by Alan E. Nourse
- 50 • Letter of the Law • interior artwork by Rudolph Palais
- 63 • Navy Day • shortstory by Harry Harrison
- 63 • Navy Day • interior artwork by Frank Kelly Freas [as by Kelly Freas ]
- 68 • A Word for Freedom • shortstory by James E. Gunn
- 68 • A Word for Freedom • interior artwork by Rudolph Palais
- 82 • Double Take • shortstory by Richard Wilson
- 82 • Double Take • interior artwork by Paul Orban
- 91 • Personalities in Science: Norbert Weiner • [Personalities in Science] • essay by uncredited
- 94 • Anachron • shortstory by Damon Knight
- 94 • Anachron • interior artwork by Philip B. Parsons
- 109 • If You Know ... • essay by uncredited
- 110 • Science Briefs (If, January 1954) • essay by uncredited
- 113 • Worth Citing (If, January 1954) • essay by uncredited
- 113 • Review: Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke • review by uncredited
- 114 • Off Course • shortstory by Mack Reynolds
- 114 • Off Course • interior artwork by Frank Kelly Freas [as by Kelly Freas ]
- bep • Robot Mining • interior artwork by Ed Valigursky
typically amateurish Avalon package; atypically weak Emsh illo. |
This story, when come upon by readers unfamiliar with the context in which it was published, might dazzle them with the somewhat lazy if smooth way Hunter drops in his Vike argot and descriptions of new technology, already common coin in sf of the time that will go unread by those who will instead decide Hunter or, say, Vonnegut made all this stuff up by themselves, in the manner of those not terribly well-versed fans who are certain that Miles Davis was a unique genius who singlehandedly remade jazz in various ways throughout his career, as opposed to a collaborator with a wide variety of other serious artists and often more of a popularizer than innovator. The subcultures have their own languages and developments that are traded off and built upon, no matter what school or schools of art we speak of; and there will be those ready to lead with their chins, like a young (mid-20s) film-review blogger who noted recently that, for a Remade Films blogathon she's setting up, she doesn't want any comparison of films based on Famous Books such as Little Women or The Maltese Falcon, but those based on obscure books and stories such as The Big Sleep, Double Indemnity, "The Most Dangerous Game." "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" and the like are just fine for her purposes. As I noted that the films of The Fly are based on a hugely famous short story, she rather sniffily hoped to shut me down with the assertion that only true fans of that kind of story would ever have heard of George Langelaan's unknown prose; she certainly had never heard of any such story. Or, apparently, of Chandler's The Big Sleep. I have refrained until now from suggesting that her ignorance isn't my responsibility (nor, certainly, her arrogance about her ignorance), and I'm quite sure that she'll never read this (or those source stories) unless it and they are thrust upon her, though whoever does so might be doing her at least some small favor. As mentioned above, Hunter is mostly having fun here, and perhaps tweaking particularly the culture around the Scott Meredith Literary Agency and Hollywood sorts he was beginning his career with at about this time...there are entirely too many worse Hunter stories one can turn to instead, and I wonder if the novel is nearly as pleasant as the short form.
The 1970 Pyramid cover at left is probably the least misleading representation in illustration of the tenor of the story, aside from Kelly Freas's original magazine illustration (where Freas himself is the model for the protagonist). The notion that the Vikes and Rees are "strange cults" might be introduced in the novel, but are hardly the case in the short form.
For a lot more praise for Hunter than I'll ever put forth, I suspect, please see the other reviews at Patti Abbott's blog. (Well, I do agree with Hunter's preference for Hammett over Chandler, that obscurity, though perhaps not to the degree to which Chandler drove Hunter up a wall; the editorial project, an original novellas bugcrusher, that Hunter at least put his name to and probably did some work on, was pretty decent even if it did have a Jeffery Deaver story.)
For a lot more praise for Hunter than I'll ever put forth, I suspect, please see the other reviews at Patti Abbott's blog. (Well, I do agree with Hunter's preference for Hammett over Chandler, that obscurity, though perhaps not to the degree to which Chandler drove Hunter up a wall; the editorial project, an original novellas bugcrusher, that Hunter at least put his name to and probably did some work on, was pretty decent even if it did have a Jeffery Deaver story.)
9 comments:
I read of lot of Evan Hunter when I was a kid. In the Seventies, I was a huge Ed McBain fan. Later, I found it Evan Hunter and Ed McBain were the same guy.
As a kid, I wondered if anti-Italian prejudice was really still so strong in the 1950s...but it was only a decade after the Axis powers, and unlike Salvatore Lombino or even my mother, my Italian heritage was hidden behind an utterly WASP name...early hostility my mother faced in the '40s might've had something to do with the naming choices my parents made.
An impressive line up of writers indeed. IF was a favorite of mine and it was one of the best looking SF digests before becoming the companion to GALAXY. I still remember sitting at my desk at work in 1974 and being shocked at the announcement that IF was going to cease publication.
Great post Todd - never read any of the SF he published. I may just stick with the 87th in fact ...
I'm with Sergio here on that. SF never has caught on with me despite being almost overexcited by Fred Hoyle's The Black Cloud. I could name (without running out of fingers) the SF books I've read after that, but now that I've rediscovered Hunter/McBain, thanks to Patti, I'm inclined to try a little of his if only for early examples of his craft.
Well, as I note above, for me, at least it's a step above the McBains and Hunters I otherwise recall reading, and way the hell above Curt Cannon...so the short form, at least, is not the worst place to start.
Matthew, it's funny you should mention Hoyle...I've been startled how many people have been reading Andy Weir's THE MARTIAN and giving me the equivalent of a confused stare when I point out what a straightforward science fiction "problem story" it is...certainly that's what Weir intended to write. "Why is this sf?" I hear...I tend to reply, what the hell do you think sf is that you want to extract a story of a stranded astronaut and his future-technological survival story from science fiction? It's the locked-room mystery equivalent in sf...one of the bedrock forms of the literature.
Well, Walker, at least GALAXY absorbed IF, and James Baen was the last editor at either magazine to be able to assemble a pro-level magazine, as the publishers kept robbing GALAXY, to pay...someone
I am not a lover of sicience fiction but when a good one comes along the genre can not be beat. I was drawn to this post today shortly after seeing the Ridley Scott/Matt Damon film The Martian (Yes, I know this is not a movie website but it was adapted from a book) and you need to see it. The combination of science, rea l humanity, and humor make for a great film. Go sse it now! I know I'm off topic here, sorry!
Not terribly off-topic, Charlie. The most remarkable thing to me about Andy Weir's novel, which the film is based on, is the degree to which the publishers were trying to distance the book from science fiction, when it's an almost simon-pure example of sf...and how many often-sensible readers have bought into that, as if there was a lack of fiction in sf dealing with technology, real humanity and, frequently, humor...I'll grant you, such work is still harder to find in sf film.
Post a Comment